Showing posts with label Weapons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Weapons. Show all posts

Saturday, March 1, 2025

German Maschinenpistole 40 (Machine Pistol 40 / MP 40)







The MP 40 descended from its predecessor the MP 38, which was in turn based on the MP 36,
a prototype made of machined steel. The MP 36 was developed independently by Erma
Werke's Berthold Geipel with funding from the German Army. It took design elements
from Heinrich Vollmer's VPM 1930 and EMP. Vollmer then worked on Berthold Geipel's MP 36
and in 1938 submitted a prototype to answer a request from the Heereswaffenamt (Army
Weapons Office) for a new submachine gun, which was adopted as MP 38. The MP 38 was a
simplification of the MP 36, and the MP 40 was a further simplification of the MP 38, with
certain cost-saving alterations, most notably in the more extensive use of stamped steel rather
than machined parts. 


The MP 40 was often called the "Schmeisser" by the Allies, after the weapon designer Hugo
Schmeisser. Schmeisser had designed the MP 18, which was the first mass-produced
submachine gun. He did not, however, have anything to do with the design or development of
the MP 40, although he held a patent on the magazine
The MP 40 submachine guns are open-bolt, blowback-operated automatic arms. The only
mode of fire was fully automatic, but the relatively low rate of fire enabled single shots with
controlled trigger pulls. The bolt features a telescoping return spring guide which serves as a
pneumatic recoil buffer. The cocking handle was permanently attached to the bolt on early MP
38s, but on late production MP 38s and MP 40s, the bolt handle was made as a separate
part. It also served as a safety by pushing the head of the handle into one of two separate
notches above the main opening; this action locked the bolt either in the cocked (rear) or
uncocked (forward) position. The absence of this feature on early MP 38s resulted in field
expedients such as leather harnesses with a small loop that were used to hold the bolt in the
forward position.
The MP 38 receiver was made of machined steel, but this was a time-consuming and
expensive process. To save time and materials, and thus increase production, construction of
the MP 40 receiver was simplified by using stamped steel and electro-spot welding as much as
possible. The MP 38 also features longitudinal grooving on the receiver and bolt, as well as a
circular opening on the magazine housing. These features were eliminated on the MP 40.
One unique feature found on most MP 38 and MP 40 submachine guns was an aluminum,
steel, or Bakelite resting bar or support under the barrel. This was used to steady the weapon
when firing over the side of open-top armored personnel carriers such as the Sd.Kfz. 251 halftrack.
A hand guard, made of a synthetic material derived from Bakelite, was located between
the magazine housing and the pistol grip. The barrel lacked any form of insulation, which often
resulted in burns on the supporting hand if it was incorrectly positioned. The MP 40 also had a
forward-folding metal stock, the first for a submachine gun, resulting in a shorter overall
weapon when folded. However, this stock design was at times insufficiently durable for hard
combat use.


Cartridge 9×19mm Parabellum
Effective firing range: 100–200 m
Maximum firing range: 250 m
Rate of fire: 500–550 rounds/min
Place of origin: Nazi Germany
Barrel length: 251 mm (9.9 in)
Overall length 833 mm (32.8 in) stock extended, 630 mm (24.8 inches) stock folded
Weight 3.97 kg (8.75 lb
Unit cost: 57 RM (1940); 230 EUR current equivalent
Designer: Heinrich Vollmer; Berthold Geipel
Produced 1940–1945
No. built 1,100,000 (estimated
Manufacturer Steyr-Mannlicher
Erma Werke
Haenel
Variants MP 36
MP 38
MP 40
MP 40/1
MP 41



A modern round consists of the following:
1. bullet, as the projectile;
2. cartridge case, which holds all parts together;
3. propellant, for example gunpowder or cordite;
4. rim, which provides the extractor on the
firearm a place to grip the casing to remove
it from the chamber once fired;
5. primer, which ignites the propellant.



Saturday, September 30, 2023

Panzerkampfwagen VI iger Tiger heavy Tank

 

  As far back as 1938 it has been realized that the PzKpfw IV tank would have to
be replaced by a more modem design some time in the future. Various prototypes
were built by a number of German companies, but none was placed in production.
 
   In 1941 an order was placed with Henschel for a 36-ton tank called the VK3,601
which was required to have a maximum speed of 40 km/h (25 mph), good armour protection
and a powerful gun. A prototype of this tank was built but further work was stopped as
an order was placed in May 1941 for a 45-ton tank called the VK4501. This was to be
armed with a tank version of the dreaded 88-mm (3.46-in) AA anti-tank gun, which had
then become the scourge of European armies. It was required that the prototype be ready for
testing on Hitler's next birthday, 20th April 1942. As time was short Henschel incorporated
ideas from the VK3601 and another tank called the VK 3001 (H).

   The end product was the VK4501 (H), the letter suffix standing for Heschel Porsche also
went ahead with its own design and built the VKVK4501 (Porsche) to meet the same
requirement. Both prototypes were completed in time to be demonstrated on on Hitler's
birthday, and the Henschel design was selected for production in August 1942 under
the designation PzKpfw VI Tiger Ausf E (SdkFZ 181).

   The Tiger was in production from August 1942 to August 1944, a total of 1,350 vechicles
being built. It was then succeeded in production by the Tiger II or King Tiger for which there
is a separate entry. In case trials proved the VIK4501 (H) a failure, a batch of 90 VK 4501 (P)
tanks was ordered, and these were subsequently completed as 88-mm (3.46-in) tank destroyers
under the designation Panzerjager Tiger (P) Ferdinand (SdKfz 184). The vehicle was named after
 its designer, Dr. Ferninand Porsche.

   There were three variants of the Tiger, these being the Tiger command tank (Befehlspanzer Tiger)
which was the basic gun tank with its main armament removed, but fitted with a winch but no crane,
and the Sturmtiger which had a new superstructure fitted with a 38-cm [14.96-in] 1"), Type 61 rocket-
launcher with limited traverse; only 10 of the last were built.

   For its time the_ Tiger was an out-standing design with a powerful gun and good armour,
but it was also too compicated arid therefore difficult to produce. One of its major drawbacks
was its overlapping wheel suspension which became clogged with mud and stones. On the Eastern Front  this could he disastrous as during winter nights the mud froze and by the morning the tank had been immobilized, often at the exact time the Soviets would attack, When the vehicle traveled on roads
a 51.5-cm [20.3-in] wide track was fitted, while a 71,5-cm [28,1-in) wide track was used for travel
across country or in comhat as this gave a  lower ground pressure and so improved traction.

   Main armament comprised an 88-mm (3.46-in) KwK 36 gun, with a 7.92- mm (0.31-in) MG34 machine-gun co-axial with e main armament and a similar weapon hall-mounted in the hull front on the right, Totals of 84rounds of 88-mm (3.-16-in) and 5:850 rounds of_machine-gun ammunition were carried.

The Tiger was first encountered in Tunisia by the British army and from
then on appeared on all of the German fronts.

Specification
PzKpfw V1 Tiger AusfE Y1 Tiger AusfE
Crew:5
Weight: 55000 kg (121,250 lb)
Dimensions: length (including armament: 8,24m (270ft )in): length
(Hull): 6.20m (20ft 4 in)
(Width 3.73m (12ft 3in)
(Height): 2.86m (9ft.25in)
[h1.1l26;2[JmL2(J ft-1 in); widLh3.T;3[m
[12 31n];he1ght2.S6m[9ft3.2>1n]

Powerplant: one Maybach HL 230P45
12 Cylinder petrol engine developing 700hp (522kW)
Performance: maximum road speed38 KM (24 mph)
maximum range road 100Km (62 miles)
fording 1.2m (3ft 11in)
Gradient 60 per cent
Vertical obstacle 0.79m (2ft 7in) Trench 1.8m (5ft ll-in).

Saturday, April 22, 2023

Flakpanzer IV/2cm Vierling

 

Other designation: Wirbelwind, Pz Fgst IV/3
Type: Anti-aircraft tank on obsolete tank chassis.
Manufacturer: Ostbau
Chassis Nos:   82001 - 90000
86 converted from Pz Kpfw IV from July to November 1944.
1 prototype converted in May 1944.
Crew 5
Weight:  22 tons
Length:  5.92 metres
Width:    2.9 metres
Height:   2.76 metres
Engine:    Maybach HL120TRM
Gearbox: 6 Forward  1 Reverse
Speed:     38  (km/hr)
Range:    200 (km)
Radio:      FuG5+FuG2
Armament: One 2cm Flakvierling
                   One 7.92mm MG34 38
Tranverse:              360⁰ (hand)
Elevation:             -10⁰ +90⁰
Sight:  Flakvisler   38/40.   KgZF2
Ammunition           3.200   1,350
Armour (mm/ angle)
                                Front.      Side.        Rear.       Top/Bottom
Turret.                   16/25⁰       16/36⁰      16/22⁰      -22⁰  open
Superstructure.      80/10⁰       30/0⁰        20/11⁰       12/85⁰ -90⁰
Hull.                      80/12⁰       30/0⁰        20/9⁰         10/90⁰
Gun Shield.           10/round
History: The Wirbelwind was developed as a mount for anti-aircraft guns on Pz Kpfw IV chassis which had been returned from the front for major overhaul. They were intended to supplement production of the Mobelwagen. In the autumn of 1944 production of the Wirbelwind ceased since the 2cm Flakvierling was not proving so effective as the 3.7cm Flak.
Specific features: The turret was removed  from normal Pz  Kpfw IV and replaced by an open-topped turret, in which the Flakvierling 38 was mounted. Some vehicles had only 50mm frontal armour since early Ausf F to G were converted for use as the chassis.
Combat service:  Issued to the Flugabwehzug (AA platoons) of Panzer regiments in Panzer divisions

Sunday, April 16, 2023

Pannzerkampfwagen I Ausf A ohne Aufbau.:


Pannzerkampfwagen I Ausf A ohne Aufbau.:
Other designation: Krupp Traktor LaSType: Light armoured tracked vehicle for training use.Manufacturer: Henschel, MAN Daimler - Benz Rheinmetall-BorsigChassie Nos: 8011-900015 produced from February to April 1934Crew 2Engine Krupp M305Gearbox 5 Forward/ 1 ReverseSpeed. 37 (km/hr)Range. 145 (km)Weight: 3.5 (tons)Length: 4.02 (Metre)Width: 2.06 (Metre)Height: 1.15 (Metre)Armor (mm/angel) Front. SideHull. 13/27⁰ 13/0⁰Rear. Top/Bottom13/15⁰ 6/90⁰History: Prevented by the Treaty of Versailles from possessing of manufacturing tanks or similarly designed armoured fighting vehicles, Germany skirted the treaty restrictions by producing fifteen tank hulls without superstructure, turrets or armaments. To speed production experience as far as possible, five companies had been selected in 1933 to produce three vehicles each. The official designation, 'Land-wirtschaftlicher Schlepper' (agricultural tractor) helped disguise the fact that any type of tracked armoured vehicle was being manufactured.Specific features: This vehicle had fully-tracked armoured hull. The suspension consisted of a sprocket, 4 road wheels, a fifth larger road wheel (also acting as an idler) and 3 return rollers. The forward road wheel was cushioned by a coil spring and hydraulic shock absorber. The other 4 road wheels were mounted in pairs, cushioned by leaf springs supported by a girder. This girder was all that remained of a suspension design which back to development from a Carden-Lloyd design.Combat service: Designed as a training vehicle, the turretless Krupp Traktor was not intended for combat. In the Spring of 1934, it was issued to the first Panzer regiments. Kraftfahrlehrkommando (Motorization Instructional Command) Zossen und Ohrdruf to give the troops their first experience of driving a fully tracked armoured vehicle.

 

Saturday, February 18, 2023

Aircraft, Gliders


A glider is an aircraft without an engine that is most often
released into flight by an aerial tow aircraft. During World
War II, both the Axis and Allied Militaries developed gliders
to transport troops, supplies, and equipment into battle. This
technique had been discussed prior to the war but never
implemented. These motorless aircraft would crash-land
behind enemy lines, often at night, and the men aboard them
would then become infantrymen on the ground.

The Germans were first to recognize the potential of gliders
 in the war, in large part because of extensive pre World
War II scientific research and sport use of them. The Germans
embraced gliding because it did not violate military prohibi-
tions in the 1919 Treaty of Versailles. Soaring clubs, which
developed in other countries as well, increased interest in glid-
ing worldwide. Sport gliders used air currents to climb and
soar for extended periods, while military gliders descended on
release from aerial tows.

By the late 1930s, Germany had developed a military
glider, the DFS-230. Built of plywood, steel, and fabric, it had
a wingspan of 68 ft 5.5 inches, length 0f 36 ft 10.5 inches, and
height of8 ft 11.75 inches. It weighed 1,896 lb empty and had
a maximum weight loaded with troops and cargo of 4,630 lb.
A total of 1,022 were produced. This glider was designed to
mount a machine gun, which the crew could use for defense.
DPS-230 gliders were employed in the invasion of Belgium
and the Netherlands in May 1940, especially in securing Fort
Eben Emael, which was the key to securing Belgium. The Ger-
mans also used gliders in the invasion of Crete and during
fighting in the Soviet Union at Stalingrad.



The Gotha 242 glider was larger than the DPS-230 and
could carry more troops. It had a wingspan of80 ft 4.5 inches,
length of 51 ft 10 inches, and height of 14 ft 4.5 inches. It
weighed 7,056 lb empty and 13,665 lb fully loaded. A total of
1,528 were built. Some were launched by rockets, but most
were simply towed by aircraft. Approximately 1,500 Go-242s
were produced, of which 133 which adapted into Go-244s,
which had twin engines. The huge Messerschmitt Me-321
glider had a wingspan of 180 ft 5.5 inches, length of 92 ft 4.25
inches, and height of 33 ft 3.4 inches. It weighed 27,432 lb
empty and 75,852 lb fully loaded. lt could perform level flight
after rocket-assisted takeoff. A total of 200 were built. The Me-
321 could transport 200 troops but was difficult to launch, and
most were transformed into the six»engine Me»323.

Great Britain was the first Allied nation to deploy gliders.
The Air Ministry’s Glider Committee encouraged the use of
the Hotspur to transport soldiers in late 1940. The Hotspur
had a wingspan of 61 ft 11 inches, length of 39 ft 4 inches, and
height of 10 ft 10 inches.It weighed 1,661 lb empty and 3,598
lb fully loaded. The Hotspur was designed to transport 2
crewmen and 6 soldiers. A total of 1,015 were built.

In 1941, the British developed the Horsa. It had a wing-
span of 88 ft, length of68 ft, and height of 20 ft 3 inches. It
weighed 8,370 lb empty and 15,750 lb fully loaded. It was
capable of carrying 2 crewmen and 25-28 passengers or 2
trucks. In all, Britain manufactured some 5,000 Horsas. They
were employed in Operations Overlord and Market-Garden.

The largest Allied glider was the British Hamilcar. With a
wingspan of 110 ft, length of 68 ft 6 inches, and height of 20
ft 3 inches, it weighed 18,000 lb empty and 36,000 lb fully
loaded. It could transport 40 troops, a light tank, or artillery
pieces. A total of 412 were built. It was employed during
Operation Overlord.

The Soviet Union introduced the A-7 glider in 1939. It had
a wingspan of 62 ft 2 inches and length of 37 ft 7 inches. It
weighed 2,000 lb empty and carried a pilot and eight passengers
A total of 400 were manufactured. The Soviets, however,
had few aircraft available for glider tows, and following the
German invasion of the Soviet Union, their priority was with
other weaponry. They used the A-7 chiefly to transport sup-
plies to partisans working behind German lines.

The U.S. Navy explored the possibility of military applications
 for gliders as early as the 1930s. In February 1941, Chief
of the Army Air Corps Major General Henry H. Arnold
ordered that specifications be drawn up for military gliders.
The Waco Aircraft Company in Troy, Ohio, received the first
U.S. government contract to build training gliders, and the
army began organizing a glider training program. Constructed
 of plywood and canvas with a skeleton of steel tubing
 the Waco CG-4A had a wingspan of83 ft 6 inches, length
of 48 ft 4 inches, and height of I2 ft 7 inches. Its empty weight
was 3,300 lb, and its loaded weight was 7,500 lb. It could carry
15 troops or 3,800 lb of cargo, including artillery pieces, a
bulldozer, or a jeep. The Ford Motor Company plant at Kings-
ford, Michigan, manufactured most of the U.S. gliders,
although 15 other companies also produced the Waco. In all
13,908 Wacos were built, making it the most heavily produced
 glider of the entire war by any power.

Because the gliders were so fragile, soldiers dubbed them
“canvas coffins.” Men and cargo were loaded through the
wide, hinged nose section, which could be quickly opened.

Moving at an airspeed of 110-150 mph at an altitude of several
thousand feet, C-47s towed the gliders with a 300 ft rope
toward a designated landing zone and then descended to
release the glider several hundred feet above ground. En route
to the release point, the glidermen and plane crew commu-
nicated with each other either by a telephone wire secured
around the towline or via two-way radios. This glider duty
was hazardous indeed; sometimes gliders were released pre-
maturely and did not reach the landing zones, and on occasions
 gliders collided as they approached their destination.
The U.S. 11th, 13th, 17th, 82nd, and 101st Airborne Divisions
were equipped with two glider infantry regiments, a
glider artillery battalion, and glider support units. U.S. gliders
ers were sent to North Africa in 1942 and participated in the

July 1943 Sicily invasion, accompanied by British gliders.
High casualties sustained in that operation led General
Dwight D. Eisenhower to question the organization of air-
borne divisions and to threaten to disband glider units. A
review board of officers convinced the military authorities to
retain them, however. Improvements were made in structural
reinforcement of the glider and personnel training.

By mid-1944, gliders had become essential elements of
Allied invasion forces. Occasionally they were used to trans-
port wounded to hospitals. During Operation NEPTUNE, U.S.
glider men with the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions flew
across the English Channel in 2,100 gliders to participate in
the D day attack. Many gliders and crews were lost during that
mission. New gliders were manufactured for Operation
MARKET GARDEN, the assault on the Germans in the Netherlands,
three months later.

Initially, the military did not distribute hazardous-duty
pay to glider men. These soldiers also did not qualify for wing
insignia worn by parachutists. Some of the men created
posters; one read: “loin the Glider Troops! No Jump Pay. No
Flight Pay. But Never A Dull Moment.” By July 1944, glider
wings were authorized for glider soldiers, and they received
hazardous-duty pay. Also in 1944, the modified Waco CG-
15A appeared, offering improved crash absorption. The
Waco CG-18A could carry 30 soldiers and was deployed during
the 1945 Rhine campaign.

Gliders were also used in the Pacific and China-Burma-
India Theaters. The final U.S. glider mission of the war
occurred on Luzon Island, the Philippines, in June 1945. 

In July, IX Troop Carrier Command Commander Brigadier General
Paul L. Williams issued an order to grant an Air Medal to
Normandy glider pilot veterans. Gliders were gradually
phased out of military inventories after the war, although the
Soviets retained them through the 1950s.

 




Thursday, October 13, 2022

A short history of the Mortar


 

Diagram of Stokes 3in mortar showing its method of operation.

Gunpowder weapons termed as mortars had been in use with artillery as early as the fifteenth century, and a huge example was deployed at the siege of Constantinople in 1453 where it was used to batter the walls and buildings of the great city by the Turkish Army. By the sixteenth century, gun founders working in England such as Peter Baud (sometimes written as Bawd) along with Peter van Collen were casting mortars with calibre of 11in and 19in, which more than delighted King Henry VIII, who rejoiced in having a powerful artillery force. Such huge calibre meant these weapons were best used in siege operations against walled cities or castles to fire projectiles at extremely steep angles of elevation to reach over the walls at very short ranges. These types of mortars retained enormous calibre for many years and remained part of the artillery train when on campaign. Gradually the size and weight of these weapon designs was reduced to make them more mobile, which also allowed them to be more versatile in the range of targets they could be used to engage. Around 1674, the Dutch military engineer Baron Menno van Coehorn (variations in the spelling of his name include Coehoorn or Cohorn) developed a mortar which fired a projectile weighing 24lbs and was used in the siege against the Dutch city of Grave during the closing stages of the Eighty Years War. This design was much more compact than anything seen previously and light enough to be moved on a horse-drawn wagon, thereby giving the infantry its first portable mortar to use against field works.

Over the next 240 years, mortars were in continuous use by armies in various wars and some of these designs reached enormous calibre. For example, at the siege of Cadiz in Spain in 1810, the French deployed mortars with 13in calibre along with other artillery. At the siege of Antwerp in 1832, the French once again deployed gigantic mortars with calibre up to 24in. The British Army also considered adopting even larger calibre when the Irish-born civil engineer Robert Mallet proposed a built-up mortar with a calibre of 36in which he intended for use during the Crimean War. A series of events meant that the war had ended in February 1856 before his design was ready, but it continued to be developed. On being test-fired, it showed design flaws and the weapon was scrapped without firing a shot in anger. The British Army still had mortars of 13in calibre in service during the nineteenth century, and both the Confederate and Union armies used mortars of this size during the American Civil War. Some of these weighed over 7.5 tons, such as the ‘Dictator’ used by the Union Army at the siege of Petersburg in 1862, and were so large they had to be transported by train. Gradually the calibre of mortars was reduced again but they were still part of the artillery branch.

It was not be for another fifty years, during the early battles of the First World War in October 1914, that a real need for some form of weapon capable of firing explosive shells at short range into enemy positions was requested. By the end of that year, both sides had halted their initial sweeping movements which were aimed at trying to outflank one another and had kept the fighting mobile. The opposing armies now settled into their respective positions and started to ‘dig in’ and create trench systems reminiscent of the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905. In that war, the Russian defenders around Port Arthur had dug a series of trenches which had to be captured by attacking Japanese troops who emerged from their own trenches which surrounded the besieged location.

The trench system which developed to snake across France and Belgium eventually extended from the Swiss border to the Channel Coast, a distance of almost 500 miles, in a virtually unbroken line of defences and counter defences. At times these positions were only a few hundred yards apart and in other places they were so close that soldiers could throw hand grenades into one anothers positions. It was a stalemate and some form of weapon was needed which would allow the troops to fire projectiles further than they could throw grenades without unduly exposing themselves to enemy fire. It also had to be sufficiently compact and light enough to be moved around the trenches. Such a weapon would release the infantry from their dependency on the artillery for support, which would allow the guns to be used to fire on other targets such as enemy artillery positions, ammunition supply points and lines of communications.

General Sir John French, Commander-in-Chief of the British Expeditionary Force in France, took up the call and asked for some ‘special form of artillery’ which his troops could fire from their trenches to ‘lob’ bombs or grenades into German positions. Designs soon began to emerge, many of which were dismissed as being impractical. For example, one design hastily produced in France was based on nothing more original than a piece of 3.7in cast iron drainpipe to fire equally crude projectiles filled with explosive. Mortars which had been made in the mid-nineteenth century, including some which may have been used during the Crimean War, were rushed to the Front, where the troops could not believe the antiquity of these weapons which they were now expected to use.

More surprising was the fact that stocks of ammunition for these weapons had been located and were of equal vintage, and units known as the ‘Trench Mortar Service’ were raised to use these weapons. The serviceability of these weapons was uncertain and methods to fire them from a safe distance had to be devised in the event that they should burst on being fired. At Pont de Hem near Estaires in November 1914, two artillery officers and nine gunners using these obsolete weapons were formed into a group and referred to themselves as the ‘Suicide Club’. Through trial and error they managed to operate these mortars and even achieve a modicum of success, firing projectiles out to ranges of 300 yards.

Whilst these heavily dated mortars and extemporised designs were sound in principle, what the troops in the front line trenches really needed urgently was a properly produced weapon. In an attempt to produce something quickly, frustrated British troops began making extemporised weapons, which included the Second Army producing mortars using brass shell cases from a factory at Armentières. The Germans, on the other hand, were far more organised and had minenwerfers (‘mine throwers’) which had been produced by the huge armaments industry of Krupp. When war broke out, the German Army had 116 medium and forty-four heavy versions of these weapons, which were categorized as trench howitzers and as such were part of the artillery. The levels of these weapons increased as the war progressed so that by the middle of 1916 there were some 1,684 of all types in service, and by the end of the war the number had increased to around 17,000 of all types.

Meanwhile in England a more promising design was being developed in the workshops at the Woolwich Arsenal in London. This was the so-called ‘Twining’ pattern, and weapons were hurriedly sent to France in January 1915. Unfortunately they proved just as unsatisfactory as the drainpipe mortars when eight out of the eleven weapons burst on being fired in the space of ten days. Such an unreliable track record only served to produce a not unnatural reluctance among the troops to fire the weapon. Captured examples of German weapons had been sent back to England to be copied and some had been sent to France, but what was needed was a weapon design which had been properly developed and field-tested before being sent to front line troops. In 1918, the Hungarian Army was using a basic mortar design of 90mm calibre known as the Magyar, which was a very simple tube affair elevated and mounted on a base plate, but worked nevertheless and around forty-eight of these weapons were issued to a division.

One person who applied himself to the task of developing a new weapon to the requirements of the army was Frederick Wilfred Scott Stokes, later to become Sir Frederick when he was knighted in 1917. He applied his engineering expertise to the problem and contrived a design which was simple and really no more than an improved idea based on the initial drainpipe design. Indeed, he personally described his idea as being, ‘little more than a piece of coarse gas-piping, sitting dog-fashion on its hind quarters and propped up in front by a pair of legs corresponding to the canine front equivalent’. Stokes was born in Liverpool in 1860 and apprenticed to the Great Western Railway and took a keen interest in engineering, being involved with designing bridges for the Hull & Barnsley Railway. He later joined the Ipswich-based engineering firm of Ransomes & Rapier and became Managing Director of the company. In 1915, he was working in the Inventions Branch of the Ministry of Munitions when he devised his idea for a new mortar, which would bear his name as the Stokes mortar. Stokes later received a financial reward from the Ministry of Munitions in recognition of his work along with a royalty payment of £1 for each of his mortar bombs used during the remainder of the war.

Stokes approached the design as a means to deliver a HE bomb at short ranges fired at a steep angle to plunge into enemy trenches, where it would explode on impact. He used a smooth bore barrel, which is to say it did not have rifling grooves inside to impart a spinning action which would stabilize the bomb in flight. The base of the barrel rested on a metal base plate and the upper end was supported on a bi-pod rest which could be traversed left and right. By adjusting the height of the legs the angle of fire could be altered. The projectiles were called bombs and produced as very simple cast iron cylinders filled with a HE compound. The fuse was the same type as fitted to the Mills hand grenades and fitted with a safety pin in the nose of the bomb. In the base a 12-bore shotgun-type cartridge filled with ballistite compound, a fast-burning smokeless powder, provided the propellant. By 1917, Stokes had standardized his bombs to 76mm (3in) and a bomb 12.6lbs bomb could be fired out to a range of 820 yards. The later version, known as the 3in Mk 1, fired a bomb weighing 10lbs out to a range of 2,800 yards. By the end of the war, the British Army had 1,636 Stokes mortars in service on the Western Front.

After the war, many Stokes mortars were used in the local wars of South American countries – the Paraguayan Army used them during the Chaco War of 1932, for example. The newly-created state of Poland purchased about 700 Stokes mortars between 1923 and 1926, which led to an unlicensed copy known as the Avia wz /28 being produced. The weapon had to be abandoned in 1931 because the bombs it fired were based on the French Brandt design and a licence to manufacture the ammunition was denied.

 

selected

Friday, March 12, 2021

Cheap and cheerful...the Sten gun By KD



Guns are kind of important in a war and after losing so many during the flight from Dunkirk, the British army needed a quick and cheap replacement. The Thompson machine guns that were bought from the US were too expensive and in 1940 production was started on a gun that cost just under £3, or about £80 at today''s prices.

Named after its inventors; Shepherd, Turpin and Enfield of the Royal Small Arms Factory of Enfield, the Stengun became the mainstay of the British army and was shipped out to guerilla fighters and partisans fighting the Germans, helped along by using the same 9mm ammo used by the German MP40. By 1945, roughly 5 million weapons had been produced.

It was easy to produce, weighed only 3 kilograms, cheap, had a minimum of working parts, (only 50 in early variants) and needed little oiling. There were 5 main variants, not counting the silenced versions, from the Mark I to the Mark V, with a refinement towards simplicity with each iteration. The exception was the Mark V which added wooden grips and butt and could fit a bayonet and was issued to the Paratroopers at the Battle of Arnhem.

Although greeted with reservation by troops initially, the Stengun became a valued asset to the Allies and aside from issues with accuracy at range, misfires, jamming, and a tendency




to fire when dropped, it was a very successful weapon whose production was only surpassed by the Russian PPSh-41 and led to many copies, from the Germans to the Chinese and many other nations.

And finally...the Stengun was so prone to fire off an entire clip of 32 rounds, by being dropped, that troops used them almost like grenades. A handful would be tossed through a door and the guns would fire until empty, handily clearing a room of the enemy.

 

Friday, January 1, 2021

Why the German 88mm Gun Was the Best Throughout WWII by Phil Zimmer

The German 88mm gun, originally designed as an antiaircraft
artillery weapon, was equally effective as an antitank gun.


General Statistics
Muzzle Velocity:                               2,755 ft/sec
Maximum Horizontal Range:           16,600 ft
Maximum Vertical Range:                35,700 ft
Maximum Effective Ceiling:            34,770 ft
Theoretical Rate of Fire:                   25 rounds/min
Practical Rate of Fire:                       12 to 15 rounds/min
Weight:                                              4.9 tons
Weight in Draft (with accessories):   7.1 tons
Elevation: -                                         3 to +85 degrees


The November 21, 1944, daylight flight of Teddy’s Rough Riders was anything
but routine for American pilot Werner G. Göring, nephew of Nazi Reichsminister
of Aviation Hermann Göring, and the other nine men on the ill-fated B-17 Flying
Fortress. Before the day was over, the plane had flown some four hours eastward
in an armada of 1,291 bombers to strike Leuna, a large chemical complex lying
deep inside Germany. The plane suffered nearly fatal damage from fierce air defense
fire from a German 88mm gun, like the Fliegerabwehrkanone (FlaK), along with other
anti-aircraft guns. As they worked their way back toward safety in England, the
two port engines began smoking and had to be shut down and the two remaining engines
cranked up as much as possible to keep the Fortress in the air.

Fuel was running desperately low as Göring ordered his crew to sit tight as they
flew low over the icy English Channel. As they approached the base at Molesworth,
the heavy Fortress was grossly underpowered and intermittently stalling. The plane
had been vibrating wildly in the air, but it eventually skid to a stop after spinning
in circles across a grass strip adjacent to the main runway. The crew had managed to
return safely from another trip over Germany despite having suffered tremendous damage,
including more than 245 holes, mostly caused by the fierce ground fire over Leuna.
25 Lost, 567 Damaged. But From What?

Others were not so fortunate. Twenty-five of the 1,291 bombers sent out that morning
never returned and another 567 were damaged, largely from antiaircraft fire. The
Luftwaffe was a shadow of its former self at that point in the war, but German
defense—bolstered by the 88s and larger guns—was credited with destroying 6,400
Anglo-American planes and damaging 27,000 others in 1944 alone.

The 88 earned its reputation as the best overall gun of the war. It was justifiably
feared by Allied airmen, tankers, and foot soldiers because of its accuracy, lethality,
and versatility. The weapon was deployed on German tanks, as an antitank gun, an assault
gun, and for antiaircraft purposes.

The German 88mm gun, originally designed as an antiaircraft artillery weapon, was equally
effective as an antitank gun.


The gun was aptly described as “anti-everything” by one infantryman. The weapon even
grudgingly made it into American comics during the war with cartoonist Bill Maudlin
showing character G.I. Willie angrily telling an officer, “I’ll let you know when we
capture the inventor of the 88.”


The Origins of the German 88mm Gun

The German 88mm gun’s lineage can be traced back to late 1916 when the German Army first
adapted the established German naval weapon for ground warfare in World War I.  Machinery
for producing both the barrels and the ammunition was readily available at the production
facilities of both Krupp AG and Rheinmetall. The German Kriegsmarine had adopted the gun
largely because a round of 88mm ammunition was considered the largest and heaviest
(about 34 pounds) that a single man could handle.

The World War I model could fire a 9.6 kilogram high-explosive to a height of 6,850 meters,
with a maximum range of 10,800 meters. Even then the Germans relied on rudimentary trailers,
stabilized by folding outrigger arms on each side, pulled by tractors to give the guns a great
degree of mobility. By late 1918 the Germans had even implemented rudimentary forms of centralized
fire control for the weapon. (Take an in-depth look at the Great War and all the moments that defined
our history inside Military Heritage magazine.)

At the end of World War I, the Versailles Treaty brought stringent sanctions on the German military
and industrial complex, especially on Krupp and Rheinmetall. Both firms established relationships
with foreign companies, enabling research and development to continue away from the vigilant Versailles inspectors. By 1933 the first few examples of the updated 88 were in the hands of the Wehrmacht. The full scale production of the officially designated 88mm FlaK 18 was underway by early 1936. The 18 was used in the name designation in an effort to mislead the treaty observers into believing that the design was a mere copy of the 1918 model.

Design Improvements (And Significant Setbacks) Throughout the 1930s

In reality, the updated weapon was a dramatic step forward. Initially designed to strike down bombers,
it was semi-automatic with the gun’s recoil used to eject the spent cartridge case and cock the firing
mechanism. The next round could be inserted by hand or with a power assisted rammer. The highly mobile axle bogies could lower the cruciform firing platform for more stabilized firing. The barrel could be swung a full 360 degrees, and a trained gun crew could fire upward of 20 rounds per minute.

That FlaK 18 had a one-piece barrel with an expected service life of 900 rounds using cordite-type
propellant and projectiles employing copper driving bands. This short barrel life would necessitate
the replacement of barrels under field conditions. Rheinmetall came up with a three-piece barrel
solution, enabling field technicians to simply replace the center section, which endured the most
firing punishment. The use of the small sections of the inner tube eliminated what would have been
severe maintenance, servicing, and field supply problems.

The German 88mm gun, originally designed as an antiaircraft artillery weapon, was equally effective
as an antitank gun.

The introduction of the three-piece barrel, called the RA 9, did present other unforeseen difficulties.
For one thing, high-priced and scarce steel needed to be used because the new barrel lacked the rigidity
of the earlier one-piece construction. Closer machining tolerances also were required, which necessitated additional man hours in construction, and the heavier barrel resulted in carriage component changes in the recoil and equilibrator mechanisms. Eventually a two-section inner barrel was introduced to lessen wear and tear and decrease incidents of shell jamming.

The use of the RA 9 and the modified carriage resulted in the 88mm FlaK 36. As the war progressed, the use of such propellants as Diglycol and Gudol lessened barrel wear. The eventual replacement of copper driving bands by sintered iron bands also lessened wear compared to the more expensive and hard to find copper. These developments increased barrel life to 6,000—and in some cases to 10,000— rounds, eliminating the initial reason for the multi-barrels. But the German production lines could not be easily changed, so the Nazis continued to produce the expensive and time-consuming multi-barrels until the last year of the war when a plant in Pilsen was able to produce a monobloc barrel using a novel vertical centrifuge casting process.

A Case of ‘The Clanks’

The updated German 88mm FlaK 37 guns added a rather sophisticated (for the time) fire-control data
display unit. This antiaircraft gun initially was to be used in the defense of the homeland, although
90 FlaK 37s were sold to Finland for defense against Soviet air raids. And nearly 200 of the guns fell
into Norwegian hands when the Germans departed that country.

All three models of the early 88s were 56 calibers long, meaning the barrel length was 56 times that of
the 88mm caliber. The standard gun fired a 17-pound shrapnel grenade that could climb thousands of feet
into the air and then burst into 1,500 or more shards that could damage or destroy any plane within 200 yards.

The antiaircraft shells had two types of fuses: those with barometric fuses set to specific altitudes
and those with time-delayed fuses. No matter what triggered them, the jagged steel fragments could
easily decapitate or dismember one or more members of a flight crew. The results of such an attack
could be devastating even for those who survived the battering. Many became afflicted with “the clanks,” a paralyzing sense of dread, and became known as “dead men flying.”

In the first half of 1944 casualty rates for every 1,000 bomber crewmen serving six months in combat
included 712 killed or missing and 175 wounded, for 89 percent. Barely one in four U.S. airmen completed 25 missions over Germany, and that minimum quota was raised to 30 missions then 35 after the liberation of France and Belgium.

For antiaircraft work, the FlaK 18 and 36 had a fuse-setting device on the left side with a slightly different device on the 37. The nose of the projectile was inserted into a cup at the top of the machine that would automatically set the fuse based on information from the target data transmission. Once set, the projectile was forced out of the device for loading. Later in the war, some FlaK 37 guns had the fuse setter located on the loading tray, speeding up the process; and, if necessary, time fuses could be set by hand with a special key by a member of the gun’s 11man crew.

Deadly Effective “AP” Rounds

The figures for the German 88mm gun vary a bit for the first three models, considering the specific model and the training of the crew. It could fire 15 to 20 rounds per minute, and even with a diminished six-man crew, the gun could be put into action within 21/2 minutes. The same small crew could prepare the gun for movement within 31/2 mintes. The maximum range was 14,860 meters and the maximum vertical range was given at 10,600 meters.

As the gun’s use expanded to other roles so did the different types of rounds employed by the Nazis.
A 1944 German ordnance listing includes 19 different rounds. That includes eight types of high-explosive (HE) rounds and seven armor-piercing (AP), with the rest being kineticenergy solid projectiles. The HE rounds employed two types of fuses. When used in an antiaircraft capacity, clockwork time fuses were employed. By the end of the war, a percussion element was added to the clockwork fuse mechanism. For use against ground targets, either type of fuse was used, with the clockwork mechanism able to produce deadly airbursts over Allied positions.

404px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-496-3491-36,_Frankreich,_Flak-Geschütz

The AP rounds also proved deadly effective. Once the projectile penetrated the target, a small bursting
charge was ignited by a delayed percussion fuse that had a tracer element in its base. The tracer aided
the gunner and the delayed fused helped create mayhem inside the target. Not fully satisfied with that,
the Germans went on to produce the AP40 rounds for use with antitank and tank guns. These used tungsten carbide penetrator slugs minus a bursting charge that carried more energy for their weight and size.
Fortunately for the Allies, use of the AP40 rounds was restricted by the limited supply of tungsten carbide.

The basic AP round used chemical energy rather than kinetic energy. The round used the hollow-charge principle to penetrate armor with an exceptionally high temperature jet formation that burned its way into the target. Most of these rounds were largely used by the feared Tiger I tank.
Mounting the 88 Onto the First Tigers

The Germans developed the Sd Kfz 7, a semitracked vehicle, to haul the 88s on their Sonderanhanger 201 trailers.
This specially designed vehicle was basically an artillery tractor, with tracks on the back and traditional tires on the front steering axel. The tracks provided cross-country mobility, contributing greatly to the usefulness of the 88, especially on the poor roads of the Eastern Front that were often no more than muddy paths.

The Germans were so impressed with the 88 that as early as 1936 plans were afoot to mount the weapon on a tank that eventually became the Tiger I.

While the ballistics of the German 88mm KwK 36 tank gun and antiaircraft guns were identical, the tank gun had a one-piece barrel and a thin jacket. Like other German tank guns, the breech block used a vertical sliding action in place of the horizontal sliding block used on the antiaircraft guns. The recoil mechanism was different and there was a double-baffle muzzle brake to lessen stress on the vehicle.

The trigger on the tank was repositioned from the breech block to the gunner’s elevated hand wheel. The heavy and well-armored turret was slow moving, adding to the tank’s ponderous reputation. The rounds were the same as used on the FlaK 18-37 series of antiaircraft guns, except for the use of the electrical primers that relied on a 12-volt vehicle battery. Some 92 rounds could be carried around and under the turret, although crews often did manage to store additional rounds.

The accuracy and distance of the Tiger I’s 88 gun often resulted in a “one shot, one kill” ratio for the
Germans against Allied tanks and their crews.

The size and the weight of the 63-ton Tiger, coupled with its somewhat underpowered V-12, 700 horsepower Mayback engine hindered mobility and usefulness on the battlefield, despite its fearsome gun.


A Self-Propelled Gun With 360-Degree Maneuverability

The Germans also used the 88mm gun as a self-propelled gun. That further improved its mobility and increased its usefulness for close-in support for ground troops. This resulted in the Selbstfahrlafette with armor protecting the engine and driver. Six of these tank hunters were used successfully in the battle for France.
However, the vehicle proved top heavy and provided very little space for the crew to operate the gun.
There was limited movement in the gun, little space for carrying ammunition, and no provision for outriggers to stabilize the gun when firing. These were succeeded by the Zugkraftwagen 18t, a larger, more powerful and more heavily armored vehicle that could travel at 40 kilometers per hour. The gun on that vehicle could be elevated and swung 360 degrees for anti-aircraft use. It came with outrigger legs and a more accommodating firing platform for the crew.

Initial plans called for 112 units, but only 14 were produced by June 1943 when production ceased when other programs were given greater priority. As Germany’s military prospects continued to diminish, additional prototypes appeared, included one mounted on a converted bus chassis. The few that were actually produced were rushed to the Eastern Front in an effort to slow the advancing Red Army.

The 88 also was mounted on railway cars and used there in antiaircraft roles. In some cases, full railway
batteries were positioned in the railroad yards. The Germans also mounted the guns on the Siebel Ferry, a shallow draught, twinhulled craft. These floating gun platform-ferry combinations proved quite effective and were used in the successful evacuation of two German divisions and all their equipment from Sicily.


The 88 On the Tiger II

Developments continued on the basic FlaK gun, resulting in the emergence of the 88 FlaK 41 that first saw real action in late 1943 in Tunisia. The barrel had been lengthened to the point that it had five main
components. The multi-segment barrel initially presented difficulties similar to early multi-barrels.
The gun proved to be a significant improvement on earlier models, despite its complexity and high cost
of production. The number of barrel segments was first reduced to four and then to three in an effort to
reduce jamming. The gun’s maximum ceiling was 19,800 meters from 10,600 meters.

The German 88mm gun, originally designed as an antiaircraft artillery weapon, was equally effective
as an antitank gun.

The German 88mm FlaK 41used an 858mm long cartridge, significantly longer than the cartridge used by its predecessors. The FlaK 41 was used primarily for air defense in the West, so its anti-armor use
was limited. The Germans found that it could outperform the older but larger caliber 10.5cm FlaK 38
and 39 heavy antiaircraft guns.

The Germans also designed an 88 PaK 43 as a dedicated antitank weapon, with the first ones coming off the production lines by the end of 1943. It soon became widely recognized as perhaps the best all
around antitank gun of the war. It could easily provide firepower in a full 360degree traverse and
it could penetrate the frontal armor of any Allied tank on the field. The gun’s distinctive, heavily
sloping front armor could deflect most oncoming rounds. The barrel was produced in two segments and
the breech was semi-automatic. The gun’s maximum possible range was 15,150 meters, enabling it to be used as a supporting field gun in addition to its antitank role.

The 88 PaK 43 was modified and placed on the Tiger II tank. This feared tank was designed to hold 40 HE and 40 AP rounds, and it first saw action in early 1944 on the Eastern Front. The Tiger II weighed in at nearly 69 tons—substantially heavier than its predecessor—yet it was still powered by the same Mayback engine, causing concern among the German military because of the Tiger II’s lack of speed, mobility, and exceptionally high fuel consumption. Because of those limitations, toward the end of the war it was used more in a defensive role.


Anti-Aircraft to Anti-Tank

The PaK 43 also was employed as a self-propelled gun in a number of forms, including the Nashorn
(Rhinoceros) and the Ferdinand. The latter was rushed into service for the Battle of Kursk in 1943
where 89 were reportedly used. The Ferdinands destroyed some 200 Soviet tanks, according to some reports, despite initial design flaws. The survivors of the fierce Kursk fighting were extensively rebuilt and were rebranded as the Elefant.

The PaK 43 was also placed on the Panzerjager Panther—or Jagdpanther—a fast-moving tank killer. It weighed in at 46 tons, could store up to 60 rounds, and could travel at speeds of 48 kilometers per hour. Fewer than the 425 units produced were actually delivered, but the Jagdpanther was pressed into action on all fronts where it earned the grudging respect of the Allies.

Interestingly, both Britain and the United States had guns with somewhat similar antiaircraft capabilities as the 88 FlaK. Both the British 94mm and the American 90mm could fire higher and loft larger projectiles.
On paper they could outperform the German gun, many contend. Both weapons, though, were bulkier and heavier.
The Allies restricted those guns to their initial antiaircraft roles, while the Germans expanded the 88’s
role to antitank and against fortified ground positions. This, in turn, led to other advances in terms of
power rammers, fuse-setting devices, and improved ammunition handling systems—-all of which made the weapon far more versatile and effective.

The German’s flexible and innovative approach to the initial 88 FlaK permitted them to learn and adapt
as the war progressed, improving the antiaircraft fire capabilities of the weapon and they successfully
modified it for tank, antitank, and related ground roles. This contributed greatly to the 88’s lasting
reputation as the legendary large gun of World War II.





Clark Gable Actor

  A film legend who went AWOL from Hollywood in favor of the USAF Hollywood has plenty of actors and actresses who have served their  countr...