Sunday, February 20, 2022

Book Review OVERLORD: THE D-DAY LANDINGS BIBLIOGRAPHICA

INFORMATION:
FORD, Ken and ZALOGA, Steven J. Oxford: Osprey Publishing,
2009, hardcover, sea pages, $27.-as, ISBN: an-1a4s03424-4
Reviewed by Lieutenant-Colonel Tod Strickland

 

 



Osprey is a well-known publishing house out of the UK that specializes in military
history, tackled with a fairly basic formula that works very well. Their basic concept
is to look at both sides in a given battle or campaign, painting a general strategic
overview and then going into tactical level detail that almost always appeals to
the amateur historian or military enthusiast. The formula works well because of
two factors. 

One is the calibre of historian that they get to write; many well-known
academics and more than the occasional up-and-comer have authored titles
in Osprey’s extensive library of military histories. Second, they generally do an
exceptional job ot making the events come to lite, through the use of excellent
multi-coloured maps and charts, a heavy reliance on photographs and well-written
narratives. Overlord: The D-Day Landings, co-authored by scholars Ken Ford and
Steven J. Zaloga, is one of their recent releases.


There can be little doubt that the D-Day landings were among the most significant events of the
Second World War and, although the subject of numerous other books, are certainly worth another
examination—particularly when one considers the rapid rate at which we are losing our veterans of this
notable event in world history. Looking back with the benefit of over sixty years of hindsight, one cannot help but be amazed at the scope and immensity of the task that both the Allies and the Axis had before them. That hundreds of thousands of men, machines and munitions would fight over strips of sand on the Atlantic coast of Europe is hard to conceive and without equal in contemporary military history. It is a topic that begs for study and understanding, and it is a natural choice for the authors, and Osprey, to tackle with a new book.

Unfortunately, this is not a “new” book and is instead a compilation of five different titles previously
published by Osprey as separate volumes. Although this has the benefit of speeding production of 

the book itself, it does introduce several issues, about which more will be said later. In general terms, the volume works from beach to beach, detailing the opposing forces and then going into detail on both the amphibious and airborne landings. With a few exceptions the scope has been deliberately limited to the events that took place on 06th June 1944 with very little detail on what occurred before or after.



Saturday, February 19, 2022

D-Day to Paris – How Long Did it Take to Liberate France?

D-Day: 6th June 1944



That morning, 130,000 Allied troops landed on beaches across Normandy, dubbed Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno and Sword. The coastline was subjected to naval bombardment as over 4,000 landing craft approached.

Simultaneously, paratroopers were dropped behind the German defences and bombers, fighter-bombers and fighters helped to disrupt and nullify gun batteries and armoured columns sent to counter the Allied advance. The assault was also ably assisted by resistance fighters, who performed a series of pre-planned sabotage attacks on the rail infrastructure in Normandy.

Montgomery had hoped to win Caen within 24 hours before going on to take Cherbourg, but the German defence in the countryside was more stubborn than anticipated and the Normandy bocage proved an obstacle to the Allies. The weather also disrupted plans.

Although Cherbourg was secured on 26th June it took a month to eventually gain control of Caen. French civilian casualties were great when the push for Caen came, with 467 Lancaster and Halifax bombers delaying their deposits on 6th July in order to ensure missing the advancing Allied troops.

Soviet action helps the Allies

Between June and August, Soviet forces drove the Germans backwards along a front from Lake Peipus to the Carpathian Mountains as part of Operation Bagration. German losses were extremely heavy, both in terms of men and machinery.

Soviet action in the east helped to create the conditions that would allow the Allies to break out of Normandy, following the implementation of Operation Cobra on 25th July. Despite dropping bombs on their own troops twice at the start of this initiative, the Allies launched an assault between Saint-Lô and Périers by 28th July and two days later Avranches was taken.

The Germans were sent into retreat, giving clear access to Brittany and paving the way towards the Seine, and were dealt a decisive blow at the Battle of the Falaise Gap, 12-20 August.

On 15th August, 151,000 more Allied troops entered France from the south, landing between Marseille and Nice. This further encouraged the German withdrawal from France. Eisenhower was eager to press them back all the way, but De Gaulle insisted the Allies march on Paris to re-establish control and order in the capital.

He had already started to prepare for this by infiltrating the city with administrators-in-waiting. On 19th August plain-clothed Parisian policemen re-took their headquarters and the following day a group of de Gaulle’s fighters seized the Hôtel de Ville.

A feeling of great anticipation swept across the city and civilian resistance again played its role, with barricades established across the city to limit German movement.

By 22nd August the American generals had been persuaded to head for Paris and French troops set off almost immediately. They pushed through the suburbs on August 24 and a column reached the Place de l’ Hôtel de Ville that night. News quickly spread and the bell of Notre Dame pealed to mark the achievement.

Some small-scale fighting occurred as French and American troops moved through into an ecstatic Paris the following day. The Germans swiftly surrendered, however, signalling the liberation of the French capital after over four years of Nazi subjugation and allowing three days of victory parades to begin.



 



Sunday, February 13, 2022

506th Easy Company Robert Burr Smith

 
 



  Robert Burr Smith Nickname Smitty
Born. 02nd May 1924 Died  07th January 1983 ) (aged 58)
Place of birth:- Tacoma, Washington, United States
 Lieutenant Colonel Robert Burr Smith (May 02 nd,1924 - January 07th,1983)
was an American Army Officer. He was famous for his service for Easy Company,
2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, in the 101 st Airborne
Division of the United States Army during World War ll.

Smith was one of the 140 Toccoa men of Easy Company.
Smith's life story was featured in the 2009 book We Who Are
 Alive and Remain: Untold Stories from Band of Brothers.
Smith was born in May 2, I924 in Tacoma, Washington.
His family moved to Los Angeles when he was seven.
Smith was sent by his grandmother to Brown Military Academy
in Pacific Beach, California because he acted as
German soldiers and yelled 'Heil Hilter!' for fun with his friend.
Smith enlisted in the army at Rochester, New York in August I8,
I942 and volunteered for paratroopers. He was sent to Toccoa,
Georgia for training and befriended Warren 'Skip' Muck and
Donald Malarkey. William Guarnere in his biography said that
Smith ‘was a nice boy, so you blamed him for the devilment,
because nobody believe it‘ on 13 thJanuary , 1945, Smith was
wounded in Foy, Belgium and was evacuated to the hospital.
He met Perconte and Malarkey and the three rejoined Easy Company
in Germany before the end of the war. Smith returned to the States
in I974 and became the CIA liaison officer to the Delta Force.
In I980,  Smith participated in the failed mission to free American
hostages in the US embassy in Tehran, Iran.Smith retired from the
CIA after a hang gliding accident. He was later diagnosed with lung
cancer. He died in January 7,1983.






Friday, February 4, 2022

HMS Ajax

 


 History of  Royal Navy cruisers (heavy cruisers, light cruisers). Royal Navy cruiser website featuring the Leander Class cruiser HMS Ajax including crew and families of ex-crew members notice board for the cruiser HMS Ajax.

HMS Ajax, was built by Vickers Armstrong at barrow and launched 1st march 1934 and completed 12th April 1935. HMS Ajax served in the South Atlantic 1939, taking a major role in the battle of the River Plate against the Graf Spee, going to the Mediterranean fleet 1940 - 1942, became part of Force H before going for refit in the United states 1943, returning to the Mediterranean Fleet 1943 till the end of the war.  HMS Ajax was finally scrapped at Newport November 1949.

Specifications for HMS Ajax

 

Displacement: 6,985 tons   Speed: 32.5kt    Complement: 550

Armament: Eight 6 inch guns in pairs. Eight 4 inch anti-aircraft guns in pairs and eight 2pdr anti-aircraft guns in pairs as well as twelve 0.5 inch machine guns in fours.   Eight 21 inch torpedo tubes in pairs and 1 aircraft.


The War In Abyssinia And The Fleet
Concentration

            A brief account of the circumstances leading up to the Italy-Abyssinian War and an outline of the campaign is of interest to most of us, in view of the relation, which these matters had to our movements during the Commission.

            In the latter part of the last century, the Italians, who were far behind Britain and France in the “race for Africa,” first cast covetous eyes at the cool and fertile highlands of Abyssinia.

           Eritrea to the north and Somaliland to the south, they already possessed, but these colonies, though providing several ports and a great length of coast line, were low lying and unhealthy, and therefore unsuitable as outlets for the growing Italian population.

 

The Italian expeditionary force, which pushed on conquest bound into Tigre, the northern province of Abyssinia, met with intial success in 1895, but it, miscalculated the strength of the Abyssinian people and the difficulty of keeping lines of communications open in that mountainous country.

         In 1896 an army of 120,000 Abyssinians, commanded by the great Emperor Menelik, surrounded the entire Italian force at Adowa and inflicted a crushing defeat upon the invaders.

            This called a halt to Italian colonial progression and a treaty was signed fixing the boundaries of the Abyssinian “Empire.”

             Nearly forty years later, Italy, whose prestige had suffered a damaging blow, was to seek revenge.

            The rise of Mussolini with his Fascist regime saw Italy grow rapidly in power during the post war years.  By the end of 1934 it was apparent that the Duce intended to start his programme of colonial expansion by the conquest if Abyssinia, which he regarded at Italy’s destiny, according to a number of bombastic public utterances made to the Black shirts.

            In December 1934 a clash occurred at Wal Wal, a watering place for tribesmen on the boundary between Abyssinia and Italian Somaliland, over the delimitation of the frontier.  Hundreds of casualties were inflicted on both sides in spite of the presence of an Anglo-Ethiopian boundary Commission.  This led to threats and demands for compensation on the part of Abyssinia and relations grew worse and worse.  At the beginning of 1935 Mussolini started to pour soldiers, labourers and war material into Eritrea and Somaliland via the ports of Massawa and Mogadiscio respectively.

            Soon vast Italian armies, merchandized to the highest degree and supplemented by large numbers of aeroplanes, were assembling on the northern and southern frontiers of Abyssinia.  A continuous stream of Italian troop ships and transports passed through the Suez Canal crowded with regulars and Black shirts vociferously acclaiming “Il Duce.”  No attack could be made until the autumn, as the rains render all highways in Abyssinia impassable between the months of June and September.

           Heedless of world opinion, Mussolini pushed on his war preparations and on 11th September 1935 Britain gave her dramatic lead to the League of Nations by concentrating her fleets in the Mediterranean, with an eye to “Military Sanctions.”

            We all know, only too well, how Gibraltar, Malta, Alexandria and Haifa were prepared for war during that hectic and uncertain autumn when Italy, enraged at Britain’s action, seemed on the point of attacking her as well as Abyssinia.

            At the end of September the long awaited blow fell and, on the trifling pretext of a frontier incident, Marshal De Bono, with an army of 150,000 men, started to advance into Abyssinia from the north, while Marshal Graziani with a smaller army advanced from the south.  The Italians made rapid progress into the plains of Ogaden in the south during the first few days, aeroplanes proving effective in the open country, but a waterless desert checked their advance.

            The northern advance was also successful and within a fortnight Italy was celebrating the fall of Adowa, scene of her humiliation.  Southwards towards Addis Ababa pushed De Bono’s army and Makale was the next town to fall.  There the advance was halted by desperate Abyssinian resistance, in which the Emperor Haile Selassie himself bore a part, aided by the increasing mountainous character of the country.  A drive by Graziani northwards towards Harrar to cut the countries only railway was unsuccessful and by the end of 1935 the situation was a virtual deadlock.  Italian aeroplanes and mechanized force were, for the moment unable to prevail against the elusive, guerrilla tactics adopted by their opponents.  Italy’s position at this time, with economic sanctions applied against her by the League of Nations, was not favourable.

            The arrival of Marshal Badoglio to replace De Bono in the supreme command was an indication that Mussolini was dissatisfied with the progress of the war.  It was soon apparent that the most strenuous efforts were to be made to achieve decisive results before the rain commenced in May.  Large scale offensives were launched simultaneously open north and south fronts in January 18936 and, for the first time in this campaign, mustard gas was dropped by Italian aeroplanes over a wide area on the northern front.  The Abyssinians, totally unprotected against gas, were soon on the retreat and Italian columns made spectacular advances to Gondar and Lake Tana in the northwest and to the shores of Lake Rudolf, along the frontier of Kenya, in the southwest.

            During February and March the Abyssinian forces held out desperately against the main attack by Badogilo’s northern army, but gradually they were driven back.

            With the fall of Magdala in April, the route lay open to Addis Ababa, which the Italians reached a few days later, their mechanized columns moving swiftly once the main mountain barriers were passed.

           The capture of Addis Ababa on 5th May meant the end to all organised resistance, on the part of the Abyssinians.  Harrarm Diredawa and the remaining unconquered area along the railway line were soon taken.

            The railway had not been cut during the whole campaign, and had remained the only line of communication between the capital and the outside world.

            By the end of May nearly the whole of Abyssinia, except the western province, was under Italian control, including Lake Tana, the source of the Blue Nile, whose water is vital for the irrigation of Egypt and the Sudan cotton fields.

            It’s an ill wind that blows no one any good and the sudden end to this struggle brought the finish of sanctions and the British Fleet was able to disperse at the beginning of June and return to its normal stations.

 
The Base Defences

            Early in September 1935 many Naval, Military and R.A.F. units suddenly found themselves “under orders.”  Owing to the special issues of tropical clothing, junior officers and men knew that they were destined for a warm climate, and as our relations with Italy were strained because of Mussolini’s aggressive attitude towards Abyssinia, it was generally surmised that this destination was somewhere between Malta and Aden.  Whether Great Britain was clenching her mauled fist primarily in support of the League of Nations, or whether she considered her Imperial Communications were threatened, it s not the object of this article to consider.

            The majority of these units found themselves at Alexandria, and very soon that large commercial port contained a bigger concentration of naval and other units than has been seen since the Great War.  The period immediately preceding the completion of our naval concentration at Alexandria, and the installation of anti-aircraft, underwater and coast defences-when the tension with Italy was at its height was most critical, and it is doubtful if many of us have considered what might have happened.

            Great Britain was unprepared for war; the Mediterranean fleet was cruising in the Eastern Mediterranean and its only base for repairs, stores, and communications, etc, was Malta, which would have been untenable in the event of war with Italy.  It was possible, too, that our line of communication through the Central and Western Mediterranean would be so severely interfered with, that the establishment of another base for the Fleet father East would be impossible.  More and more dependent does a modern fleet become on a well-equipped and well-defended base, yet the possibility of the Mediterranean fleet having to operate from one or more unequipped and undefended anchorages loomed very large at this period.

            Alexandria was most conveniently situated from a geographical point of view and lent itself fairly easily to defence by coast artillery and underwater defences; the installation of A.A. defences was simplified by the fact that the anchorage was situated at very nearly the maximum range of the nearest Italian air base; attacking aircraft were therefore limited to a direct approach, along which topographical conditions allowed the main effort of the ground defences to be concentrated.

            The first personnel for defences of Alexandria arrived on 14th September 1935 in the transport Neuralia and consisted of 250 Royal Marines and 600 Army ranks; the Royal Marines consisted of the Landing and Transport Company of the M.N.B.D.O., and the Army units of one A.A. battery R.A. one Searchlight Company R.E., with their necessary R.C.’s, R.A.M.C. and R.A.O.C. detachments.  The tractors, lorries, guns and searchlights arrived shortly afterwards in S.S. Bellerophon, which had been hurriedly loaded by the troops, at Portsmouth, before sailing.  The R.M. unit was known as H.M.S. President III-one of the few “ships” ever commissioned and commanded by a R.M. Officer.  The force was quickly disembarked from Neuralia, which returned home, and the troops were temporarily quartered in H.M. Ships Woolwich and Resource, and at Mustapha.

            The object of this force was to provide A.A. defences ashore at any anchorage, which the commander in Chief might require for use by the Fleet-A.A. defence, had priority over all other shore defences.  The force was capable of loading, transporting across country, installing and maintaining these A.A. defences wherever they might be required.

            Preliminary work was immediately commenced on reconnoitring battery positions, preparing gun pits, buildings O.P.’s selecting camp sites, etc, for the defences of Alexandria, the equipment and personnel for which were known to be arriving in the near future.

            On 26th September 1935, H.T. Lancashire arrived at Alexandria with the royal Naval personnel for the installation of underwater defences, Port War Signal station, 1,400 royal Marines, and additional Army details under the command of a Brigadier R.M.  This force was known as H.M.S. President IV, in which President III was ultimately absorbed to form the “Base Defences, Mediterranean.”  The R.M. units in Lancashire included 6-inch, 4-inch and pom-pom coast defence batteries, an AA battery and Searchlight Company together with additional transport personnel, a Workshop Section, and the necessary administrative units.  The store ships S.S. Atreus and Bencruachan arrived shortly afterwards.

            Heavy tractors, trailers, gun transporters and lorries were soon to be seen passing to and fro along the streets of Alexandria; camps sprang up almost overnight in widely separated areas, and guns and searchlights began to arrive at their pre-arranged positions.

            Few of the personnel of the fleet ever realised to what extent Alexandria was finally defended; the following gives a very brief idea of the layout of the defences:

            6-inch battery at Agami with coast defence searchlights.

            6-inch battery at Ras-el-Tin with coast defence searchlights.

            4-inch battery at Mex with coast defence searchlights.

            Pom-pom battery at Shirou with coast defence searchlights.  The requirements of A.A. shore defences call for dispersion of the 3-inch two gun sections, and they were disposed in a narrow eclipse round Alexandria, Mustapha, Silsila, Ras-el-Tin, Mex, Agami, Dekhela and along the southern shore of Lake Mariout.  The Searchlight positions were even more scattered, and there were approximately 20 of these, each commanded by a corporal and 12 men.  Two at least of these positions were supplied daily with food and water by camel transport owing to the nature of the ground.  Listening ports in connection with these defences were situated as far distant as Mersa-Matruh and Burg-el-Aeabe.

            In addition to these defences at Alexandria, personnel of the Base defences were absent in connection with the installation of coast defences at Mersa-Matruh, Haifa, Port Said, Suez and Port Sudan, and its Headquarters in Lancashire was therefore dealing at this period with a very large area.

            Reserve ammunition and stores of the Base Defences were concentrated in store huts at Dekhela, where a R.M. guard of 150 men was continuously maintained.

            The maintenance of communications, and the daily administration of units so widely dispersed was naturally a big problem; nearly 300 miles of telephone cable was laid in Alexandria alone, and the motor-transport drivers and their vehicles were called upon for continuous hard work.

            As time progressed, permanent hutments and cookhouses were erected in most of the larger camps, and these began to take the form of small towns rather than the hastily erected encampments, which appeared initially.  Canteens were established in all camps, and every little comfort that the ingenuity of the officers and men could devise was added to make life easier.  The two great enemies were insects and sand, and although these were very troublesome in the early days, they were fighting a losing battle when the camps were finally evacuated in July 1936.  The order for evacuation was received in the camps on 9th July 1936, and within four weeks every man, gun, searchlight, lorry, etc, was once again in England.

            Throughout the period of strained relations with Italy certain units of the defences were ready to sail at short notice to any other anchorage which the Commander in chief might require for the use of the Fleet and which would require defences.  These units were known as the “Port X force,” and the majority of their stores remained in S.S. Bellerophon and Bencruachan; 150 of the personnel of this force were continuously embarked in H.T. Lancashire for maintenance purposes, and the remainder were always ready for immediate embarkation.

            To the majority of the personnel in the Fleet the “Base Defences” called to their mind a white ship-the Lancashire-which rarely went to sea, and contained a large body of Royal Marines who had nothing to do.  I hope that this very brief description of the Base Defences will help to dispel that idea, and also emphasize the fact that ship are of little value in war, however efficient they and their ships companies may be, unless they have a well defended base from which to operate.

Extracted from A Record of the First Commission of HMS Ajax April 1935 to August 1937 on the Mediterranean and America and West Indies Stations.
Exercises

            During the months of February and March we had the most trying and strenuous months of the Mediterranean interlude.  The early preparations of a great fleet for all contingencies had been completed.  Organisation was complete and the Commander in Chief was left with the task of tuning up his great fighting machine.  It had been realised that aircraft would play a very much greater part in any war nowadays than had been met before.  Accordingly the Gunnery Co-operation flight, or “Queen Bee” party, was sent out to Alexandria early in February.  This form of wireless controlled aerial target had of course been in use in the Navy for some time, but it was brought out particularly to give the fleet at Alexandria a chance to get their anti-aircraft armament up to absolutely first-rate efficiency.

            These “Queen Bee2 aircraft were kept on shore and whenever required for a practice the Australia would hoist one on to her catapult and put to sea.  The principal controlling officer was on her bridge, and it was he who directed the aircrafts movements.  As a stand by in case his set lost control, another ship was required to act as secondary control ready to take over at a moments notice.  This lot fell to Ajax, so that for the following seven weeks we found ourselves going to sea whenever a practice was being carried out.  The somewhat negative duty of being prepared was supplemented by making us flank mark, and keep records of the shoots for analysis afterwards.

            The 1st Cruiser Squadron carried out the first shot on 15th February.  One plane was shot down in the forenoon by close range fire of the 1st C.S. and in the afternoon we were very glad to see Ajax along bring one down at long range.  We therefore could afford to criticise the efforts of other ships, so many of which we were forced to witness.  Many and various were the weird squadrons that would sail down between Australia and Ajax.  Battleships, aircraft carriers, cruisers, repair ships, depot ships, destroyers and net layers all had their fling.  Some of the shoots made good watching, especially some of the more ambitious barrages, but we were one and all sick of the sight of Queen Bees by the time the last one was killed.  According to the official report on the matter, the Fleet learnt a great deal in those two months.  We are glad that our labours were not in vain.

            In the midst of this anti-aircraft programme we had to take our place in the routine gunnery and torpedo practices of the squadron, so we did not get much time in harbour.  On the 20th March Admiral Sir W. W. Fisher handed over the Fleet to Admiral Sir A. D. P. R. Pound and sailed for England in the Queen Elizabeth.  All ships manned and cheered ship as he went out.  He had done the nation a great service during his additional six months of command, and though we perhaps did not occupy the highest place of favour in his eye, we must all recognise the great work that he did during those critical months.

            The new C-in-C spent the next three days visiting every ship in the fleet.  He came onboard Ajax on the Monday and later that week we heard that we were to fly his flag at sea for exercises.  At first little was known as to what was required of us, but on Tuesday 31st, he came attended by nine staff officers.  Ship’s staffs were augmented in the communication and cipher departments, and for 24 hours we were the flagships.  We are happy to be able to record that as far as we know the ship gave every satisfaction in its unexpected role, and though we are thankful that the war for which we were preparing never occurred, it is a pity that we could not show our full ability.

            Those, men, were the incidents, which were occupying us during those two months.  The monotony was soul destroying.  Even the eternal buzz that we were returning to our station next Friday week began to flag and fail.  Rear Admiral A. E. Evans, erstwhile Commodore of the South American Division, came onboard and walked round divisions one Sunday, and said a few words of encouragement, wishing us luck on return to Patagonia.  And yet the weeks dragged on.  Ships came and went.  The first Cruiser Squadron had swollen to 11 on arrival of the Sydney, the new Australian cruiser.  At the end of March certain leave restrictions were removed, and it was made possible to go to Cairo for a couple of days.  Many took advantage of this concession.  Sports were the refuge of many, and the ship did very well in Squadron football league, being beaten in the final by the London.  This was an especially good show, when one realises that the ships against which we were competing had much larger ships companies.

 
Cairo

            Busy streets, taxicabs, buses, tramways, large hotels, modern shops and carefully lay out gardens-that was my first impression of Cairo.  Bur for the characteristic smock like dress of the natives, and the fez, which are seen on every hand, I might almost have imagined myself to be in a European city.  Not until I visited the Citadel, an ancient fortress built by Saladin in 1163 on a hill almost in the centre of Cairo, did I realise the capital of Egypt is termed the “City of mosques.”

            Part of the Citadel is still used to house a garrison, but the rest of it is open to visitors and from its windows some wonderful views are to be seen.  In one direction I looked out towards the Great Pyramids on the edge of the desert in the suburb of Giza; in another direction I looked over the Moslem part of the town, and it is there that the flat monotony of city roofs is relieved by the domes and minarets of scores of mosques.  A mosque is always built with a tall minaret from the balcony of which a muezzin or priest calls the faithful to worship “Allah” at appointed hours.

            The interior of a mosque is well worth seeing, and the one I chose to visit was El Rifai Mosque, in which the late King Fuad had recently been buried.  His tomb, an elaborate affair of alabaster and marble, was in a screened off corner-a private chapel, as it were-through which there was a constant stream of people, the natives in bare feet and the foreign visitors wearing canvas overshoes which they are compelled to put on before entering the mosque.  In this chapel were half a dozen venerable old men sitting cross-legged on the floor and poring over the Koran, a copy of which lay open on a stool in front of each one.  The Moslems believe it to be good for the soul of the departed that these men should sit there reading the Koran, though in truth it seemed to me that they were either chatting with one another of dozing over their books.  Certainly not more than one of the six was reading.

            In the main hall of the mosque a score or more of natives were standing in one long line for prayer.  The priest who stood in front of the line led the prayer, and as he bowed towards Mecca, the remainder also knelt and bowed low, touching the ground with their foreheads.  This ritual, incidentally, accounts for the use of the fez amongst Mohammedans.  They consider it wrong to uncover the head in the mosque and the fez is the only type of hat, which allows them to put the forehead on the ground whilst wearing it.

            No visit to Cairo would be complete without seeing the Great Pyramids and the Sphinx at Giza.  Many years ago, the journey to these had to be made by camel or mule across the sands of the desert, but now, thanks to a splendid modern road, I was able to reach them speedily and in comfort by motorcar.  On reaching Mena House Hotel at the foot of the plateau on which these stand, I found that to get a “close up” view it was necessary either to walk over the deep sand or ride on a donkey or camel; I chose to ride one of the latter and found this an experience in itself.  The camel seemed to rise and fall and develop a rolling motion, so I soon realised why these beasts are called “ships of the desert,” and would myself much prefer ships of the sea.

            Though lacking beauty of design, the pyramids are certainly majestic and fitting tombs for the ancient Kings of Egypt.  Perhaps they presented a much more impressive spectacle when they were completely covered with alabaster, all of which has been removed at various times for use in constructing mosques and other buildings within the city.  The largest, the Pyramid of Cheops, was built about 3733 B.C., and it is said to be built from 2,300,000 huge stone blocks and to have taken 100,000 men, working three months each year, twenty years to erect it.  It is 450 feet high, each side at the base being 764 feet in length, and it covers roughly thirteen acres.  For a small fee, guides will climb to the top and come down again in about seven minutes-no mean feat.  Visitors may ascend with a guide f they wish, but I felt this would prove rather too strenuous in the boiling midday heat.

            The inside of the pyramid is open to the public, access being gained through an opening only a few feet from the ground.  I was thus able to investigate the huge central chamber, high up in the pyramid, which was once the tomb of kings.  Now it is merely a large chamber, lined with granite and completely devoid of any decoration.  The ascent along a steep narrow tunnel was very tiring, as in many places it was quite impossible to walk in an upright position.  Perhaps the most remarkable feature inside the pyramid is the ventilation, which is effected by means of shafts about a foot square, which run straight to the outside.  In spite of this, the air, though reasonably fresh, is cold and damp, and it was indeed a pleasant relief to be once more out in the sunshine.

            Behind the pyramids stands the Sphinx, the mysterious looking creature with the body of a lion-the symbol of strength, and the head of a man-the symbol of wisdom.  Near by is a temple containing tombs built from blocks of alabaster and granite, which were brought down the Nile from Aswan, 600 miles away.  As some of these are six feet thick and fourteen feet long, they must have presented quite a problem, even to the famous Egyptians.

            Once again back in Cairo, I decided to visit the world-renowned Egyptian Museum and learn more of the tombs of the ancient Pharaohs.  It was impossible during a short visit to see more than a small portion of the vast number of exhibits this treasure house contains, and though there are many things of more historic interest, no exhibits have the same magnificence as those excavated from the tomb of Tutankhamen by Lord Carnarvon and Mr Carter.  Their value must be fabulous, and after seeing this marvellous collection of treasures, I realised the great task they had set themselves and the pleasure and satisfaction they must have felt on seeing the fruits of their labour.  The collection, though excavated from tombs, portrays vividly the life of the ancient Egyptians, their homes, industries, artistic attainments and wealth.  The Egyptian Government has recently passed a law prohibiting the removal of these relics from the country, and not without reason, for there is no more fitting place in which they could be seen than in land in which they were originally made and used.

            Shops have a curious fascination for most of us and the bazaars of Cairo are no exception.  They are situated in narrow lanes and streets, and it is here that the natives of the city sell wares from all parts of the East.  In many ways the Egyptian has become Westernised, but not so in selling, for he still loves to bargain over the price of his goods.  At first he asks an exorbitant price for them, but can easily be brought down if you adopt an air of difference, and a sale is frequently transacted over a cup of “moka,” that inky coffee in which he seems to delight, and a highly perfumed oriental cigarette.

The Messerschmitt Bf 109

  

 


   The Messerschmitt Bf 109, like the North American P-51,1 might have been the plane that never was. The Bayerische Flugzeugwerke (Bavarian Aircraft Company or BFW) was initially blocked from being sent contracts due to a long running feud between Willy Messerschmitt and the Secretary of State for Aviation, Erhard Milch.2 In order to save BFW from liquidation,3 Messerschmitt and his joint manager Herr Kokothanki, obtained a contract from a Romanian cartel, to develop the M-37 light transport. Protests were made against Messerschmitt's acceptance of a foreign contract, but Willy Messerschmitt argued that due to a lack of home support, he was forced to seek contracts outside of Germany. Consequently, BFW was awarded a contract for fighter development.4
    In 1934, the German Ministry of Aviation (Reichsluftfahrtministerium, or RLM) issued specifications for a new fighter monoplane to replace the Heinkel He 51 and Arado 68 biplanes.5 It was to be equipped with at least two MG-17 7.9 millimeter machine guns, and to have the capability of utilizing the new 12-cylinder, liquid-cooled, vee-engines under development by Junkers and Daimler-Benz. The request was sent to Focke-Wulf, Arado, Heinkel and BFW. Focke-Wulf submitted the Fw 159V1, Arado the Ar 80V1 and Heinkel the He 112. The Bf 109 was the winner in the trials, exceeding its nearest rival, the Heinkel He 112, by 17 mph.6 Only the He 112 provided any other serious competition besides the Bf 109 in the trials and ten preproduction prototypes were ordered for the Heinkel He 112 and Bf 109.
     Despite the earlier odds of being issued a contract for a production fighter aircraft, Willy Messerschmitt had been developing the Bf 109A alongside the Bf 108A.7 The first Bf 109 prototype, the Bf-109V1 had a British Rolls-Royce Kestrel engine when it made its debut in September 1935, and had a higher wing loading (24 lbs/sq ft.) than that of any other aircraft submitted for the competition. (The closet rival had 20.3 lbs/sq ft.)8 The "Bf-109V2" used a 455 kW (610 hp) Junkers Jumo 210A and was not fitted with armament. The Bf-109V3, was fitted with a pair of MG-17 7.9 mm machine guns. This armament arrangement was envisioned for the Bf 109A, but this production model was never flown, due to a new international requirement based on the view of the four-gun Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane. Since no wing armament was required at the onset, the Bf 109 had a thin wing with the main spar at mid-chord, requiring a major wing redesign with later versions. On the opposing side, the Spitfire and Hurricane were designed with wing armament in mind, from the very beginning. 9     
    Bearing in mind that the Bf 109 was to become one of the Royal Air Force's major opponents in the Second World War, it is ironic that the prototype had a 695 hp British Rolls-Royce Kestrel engine, when it made its debut in September 1935, as development of light weight aircraft military-type engines was prohibited under the Traety Of Versailles. In any case, Rolls-Royce was using a German built Heinkel He 70 to flight test some of its latest engines at about the same time. 10


    The Bf-109V4, first flown in November 1936, powered by a Jumo 210A engine was the first version to carry three machine guns in the nose. The third gun fired through the propeller spinner, but this gun was later replaced with a 20 mm, MG FF/M cannon. The Bf 109V5, Bf 109V6 and Bf 109V7 production prototypes flew early in 1937 powered by the Jumo 210B, paralleled the development of the Bf 109B. The Jumo 210B had the same power rating as the 210A for takeoff, but allowed greater power at high altitude, and increased the service ceiling.

    When first 'blooded' in the Spanish Civil War, it became clear to the German Condor Legion that their Heinkel He 51 biplanes were inferior to Italian built fighters, and the Soviet Union Polikarpov I-16s. Although not used in continuous service since they were prototypes, Bf-109V4, V5 and V6 were sent to Spain,11 and valuable front-line experience was gained to enhance further development. Meanwhile, Willy Messerschmitt was already preparing the first production Bf 109s for dispatch to Spain. The Bf 109B-1 was supplied to two Gruppen (groups), the JG 132, the "Richthofen" Jagdgeschwader (fighter wing) and the 2nd Staffel (squadron) of Jagdgruppe (fighter group) 88. Bf 109B-1s arrived in April 1937, and B-2s were supplied to the 1st Staffel of J/88 in August. The B-1 featured a 680 hp Jumo 210Da engine, a Reflexvisier gunsight, and a short-range FuG 7 radio.12 Approximately 30 B-1s were produced before they were replaced with B-2s. The main difference was the change from a fixed wooden prop to a VDM two blade variable-pitch prop.13 The 3rd Staffel was supplied with Bf 109Cs and Ds in April 1938. It wasn't long before the Republican forces found out their Polikarpov I-15s and I-16s were no match for the Bf 109. A total of 136 Bf 109s had been sent to Spain, including the latest E model. Approximately 50 C-series, and 650 D-series were built.
     The Bf 109E was the first true mass production model and was able to outfight or outrun virtually all opposition. Like the Spitfire, the Bf 109 saw action throughout the war. This version was often referred to as the Me 109, but official German documentation referred to as the Bf 109, referring to the Bayerische Flugzeugwerke, although the company was reorganized as Messerschmitt A.G. in July, 1938.14

    Bf 109V14 and V15, using the 1,050 hp (783 kW) DB 601 engine, served as development aircraft for the Bf 109E. The additional heat generated by the DB 601 engine, required a major redesign, so additional radiators were installed in the wings, and an oil cooler was installed beneath the engine. Some E models were equipped with four MG 17s, and the remainder were equipped with two MG 17s in the fuselage and two MG FF cannons in the wing roots. Also produced was a bomber version, the Bf 109E-1/B, fitted with racks for four 50 kg (110 lb) or one 250 kg (550 lb) bombs. Additional equipment included a VDM three blade variable-pitch prop, Revi reflector gun sight, heavier armor for pilot protection,15 and a FuG 7 radio set. Like the Bf 109V7, fitted with a Jumo 210G fuel injected engine, the DB 601 installed on the E model was also fuel injected. This provided a greater advantage which maintained positive fuel flow during negative-g maneuvers, as opposed to float-carbureted type engines, which often sputtered or cut-out.16 The Bf 109E-3 had a provision for a 20-mm MG FF cannon firing through the prop spinner, however the cannon had proved unreliable, due to overheating, and was seldom used operationally.
     The fact that the Bf 109 had too limited a range to be fully effective as a bomber escort, persuaded the German authorities to consider the type most useful as a defensive fighter in Europe. This was reflected in the more refined, but relatively lightly-armed version of the fighter, the Bf 109F. Bf 109V21 and V24, using the 1,050 hp (783 kW) DB 601N engine, served as development aircraft for the Bf 109F. Gone were the wing root guns, prompting many pilot complaints. After Helmut Wick was killed on November 28, 1940, Major Walter Oesau refused to fly a Bf 109F as long as spare parts were available to keep his E-4 flying. Another German veteran who disliked the reduction in armament was Major Adolph Galland, who became a General at the age of thirty, and rose to be the Inspector-General of the Fighter arm.17 Slightly more than 2,000 Bf 109Fs were built before being replaced by the more heavily armed Bf 109G.18

    Not until the arrival of the Bf 109G was faith in the type fully restored, and this version was built in huge numbers for a variety of roles. It was in a Bf 109G-14 that Major Erich Hartmann of the Luftwaffe reached his unrivaled total of 352 confirmed victories, although these were gained on the Eastern Front where German fighters easily outclassed the early Soviet fighters. From the summer of 1942 the Bf 109G powered by a Daimler-Benz DB 605D producing 1,800 hp with water-methanol injection and giving a speed of 685 km/h (428 mph), entered service in Russia and North Africa before being deployed in every other theater. With its standard armament of a cannon and two machine guns the Bf 109G, remained the major version right up to the end of hostilities in May 1945. The G model served with all forces Axis on the Eastern and Italian fronts, and was exported to Switzerland and Spain.

    Approximately 35,000 Bf 109s of all versions were produced, (nearly as many as the Ilyushin Il-2 Shturmovik) but the true number can not be determined, as parts from damaged airplanes, of bombed-out factories, were used to build other airplanes.19 Others were built in Czechoslovakia, and many went into Czech Air Force service after the war. Another post-war operator was Israel, and Bf 109s built by Hispano in Spain, as HA-1109s and HA-1112s, were still active into the seventies. With the last of them, the wheel turned full circle. Like the original prototype, they were powered by a Rolls-Royce engine - this time the Merlin .

    On April 26,1939,20 a specially prepared version, the Me 209 was fitted with greatly boosted engines, gained a series of world speed records, some of which were to remain unbeaten for 30 years. Its purpose was solely to break speed records and bore no resemblance to the Bf 109, other than the use of the Daimler Benz DB 601 engine. It flew to a new speed record of 470 mph (756 km/h) on April 26,1939. This record was not broken until August 16,1969, with a specially modified Grumman F8F Bearcat.21

     The fact that the Bf 109 had too limited a range to be fully effective as a bomber escort, persuaded the German authorities to consider the type most useful as a defensive fighter in Europe. This was reflected in the more refined, but relatively lightly-armed version of the fighter, the Bf 109F. Bf 109V21 and V24, using the 1,050 hp (783 kW) DB 601N engine, served as development aircraft for the Bf 109F. Gone were the wing root guns, prompting many pilot complaints. After Helmut Wick was killed on November 28, 1940, Major Walter Oesau refused to fly a Bf 109F as long as spare parts were available to keep his E-4 flying. Another German veteran who disliked the reduction in armament was Major Adolph Galland, who became a General at the age of thirty, and rose to be the Inspector-General of the Fighter arm.17 Slightly more than 2,000 Bf 109Fs were built before being replaced by the more heavily armed Bf 109G.18

    Not until the arrival of the Bf 109G was faith in the type fully restored, and this version was built in huge numbers for a variety of roles. It was in a Bf 109G-14 that Major Erich Hartmann of the Luftwaffe reached his unrivaled total of 352 confirmed victories, although these were gained on the Eastern Front where German fighters easily outclassed the early Soviet fighters. From the summer of 1942 the Bf 109G powered by a Daimler-Benz DB 605D producing 1,800 hp with water-methanol injection and giving a speed of 685 km/h (428 mph), entered service in Russia and North Africa before being deployed in every other theater. With its standard armament of a cannon and two machine guns the Bf 109G, remained the major version right up to the end of hostilities in May 1945. The G model served with all forces Axis on the Eastern and Italian fronts, and was exported to Switzerland and Spain.

    Approximately 35,000 Bf 109s of all versions were produced, (nearly as many as the Ilyushin Il-2 Shturmovik) but the true number can not be determined, as parts from damaged airplanes, of bombed-out factories, were used to build other airplanes.19 Others were built in Czechoslovakia, and many went into Czech Air Force service after the war. Another post-war operator was Israel, and Bf 109s built by Hispano in Spain, as HA-1109s and HA-1112s, were still active into the seventies. With the last of them, the wheel turned full circle. Like the original prototype, they were powered by a Rolls-Royce engine - this time the Merlin .


    On April 26,1939,20 a specially prepared version, the Me 209 was fitted with greatly boosted engines, gained a series of world speed records, some of which were to remain unbeaten for 30 years. Its purpose was solely to break speed records and bore no resemblance to the Bf 109, other than the use of the Daimler Benz DB 601 engine. It flew to a new speed record of 470 mph (756 km/h) on April 26,1939. This record was not broken until August 16,1969, with a specially modified Grumman F8F Bearcat.21

Endnotes:
1. Dutch Kindelberger of North American refused to give "kick-backs," to USAAF procurement officers in order to secure a
   contract for the P-51 Mustang.
   Enzo Angelucci and Peter M Bowers. The American Fighter. (Mila, Italy; Haynes Publishing Group., 1987.) 330.
2. In 1928, the M 20 prototype, designed by Willy Messerschmitt, was involved in a crash during testing. This crash and others,
   caused Lufthansa to cancel future orders for the type, which led to the bankruptcy of BFW in 1931. Killed in the crash was Hans
   Hackman, a close friend of then Lufthansa President, Erhard Milch
3. Bayerische Flugzeugwerke (BFW) was reorganized in 1933.
   Uwe Feist, Norman E. Harms, & Mike Dario. The Fighting 109. (Garden City, New York; Doubleday & Company, 1987.) 3.
4. Martin C. Windrow. Aircraft In Profile. The Messerschmitt Bf 109E. (Surrey, England; Profile Publications Ltd., 1965.) 1.
5. William Green. Famous Fighters of the Second World War. (Garden City, New York; Doubleday & Company, 1987.) 9-10.
6. Uwe Feist, Norman E. Harms, & Mike Dario. 7.
7. The Bf-108A was a four-seat, low-wing, monoplane with dual controls; a flush-riveted fuselage; retractable landing main gear
   and had an enclosed cockpit. The engine was a Hirth HM-8V inverted-vee engine with 186 kW (250 HP), driving a three-blade
   propeller. It could fly at 200 mph (320 kph) and was extremely agile.
8. Uwe Feist, Norman E. Harms, & Mike Dario. 5.
9. Ibid. 6.
10. Michael J. Taylor & John W.R. Taylor. Encyclopedia of Aircraft. (New York, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1978. 156.)
11. Uwe Feist, Norman E. Harms, & Mike Dario. 10.
12. Ibid.
13. The VDM variable-pitch propeller was license-built from American Hamilton Standard.
14. William Green. 16.
15. John R. Beaman, Jr. & Jerry L. Campbell. Messerschmitt Bf 109 in Action. (Carrollton Texas, Squadron Signal Publications Inc.,
   1980.) 33. (Armor protection was actually introduced on later Bf 109E-3s, and retrofitted on earlier E-3s and E-1s.)
16. David Mondey. The Concise Guide to Axis Aircraft of World War II. (New York, Smithmark Publishers, 1984.) 166.
17. Joachim Dressel and Manfred Griehl. 45.
18. Martin C. Windrow. 9.
19. Bf 109 Production numbers vary widely from different sources. Numbers listed are 30,500, 33,000 and 35,000 aircraft produced.
20. Wikopedia. Messerschmitt Me 209.
21. Ibid. .

Addition Sources:

Joachim Dressel and Manfred Griehl. The Luftwaffe Album. (London, The Cassell Group, 1994.) 37-38.
William Green & Gordon SwanBorough. The Complete Book of Fighters. (New York, Smithmark Publishers Inc., 1994.) 376-378.

German Maschinenpistole 40 (Machine Pistol 40 / MP 40)

The MP 40 descended from its predecessor the MP 38, which was in turn based on the MP 36, a prototype made of machined steel. The MP 36 was ...